September 18

Quadrilaterals and Equivalence Proofs

Types of Quadrilaterals | Equivalence Proofs

Types of Quadrilaterals

ttt

Polygons are closed figures made up of lines and points. The vertices of the polygon are the points, and the sides of the polygons are lines connecting those points. An n-gon is a short hand way of denoting a polygon of n sides and n vertices.

A quadrilateral is a four-sided polygon. Certain quadrilaterals have special names: rectangle, square, parallelogram, rhombus, trapezoid, and kite depending on their properties. One problem in mathematics is what is the least number of properties that must be defined to charactierize an object.

For example, a square can be defined as quadrilateral of 4 equal sides and one right angle. However, a square can also be defined as a quadrilateral with two adjacent sides equal, one right angle, and two opposite sides parallel OR as a quadrilateral with diagonals which are equal and perpendicular to each other. Which properties are preferred as a definition of a square?

The issue is not so much which properties are preferred, but are they equivalent? In other words, given one definition, can the others be proven from that starting point?

ttt

Equivalence Proofs

ttt

The basic equivalence proof is usually stated:
Given an object, prove the following are equivalent:
a) property A
b) property B
c) property C

and so forth

To prove equivalence, start with the first property. Assume that property only, and prove the second. Then start with the assumption of the second property and prove the third, etc. etc.

At the end of the list of properties, assume the last and prove the first.

ttt

For example, in an isosceles triangle, the following are equivalent:

a) the base angles are congruent
b) the sides opposite the base angles are congruent
c) the angle bisector of the vertex angle is also the perpendicular bisector of the base.

The first proof would be stated:

with the hypothesis:
Given triangle ABC
with < A and < B congruent.

and with the conclusion:

The second proof would be stated:

with the hypothesis:

and with the conclusion:

prove that the angle bisector of < C is also the perpendicular bisector
of the base

The third proof would be stated:

with the hypothesis:
Given triangle ABC with the angle bisector of < C as being also the perpendicular bisector
of the base,

and with the conclusion:

prove the base angles < A and < B are congruent.

ttt

Syllabus | Assignments | Home | Welcome | Bibliography | Class Links